when in doubt, question reality

thought police

It happens enough that stand-up comics write routines about it. (And isn’t that the true measure of how far a model has pervaded our culture?) A person is talking on a bluetooth headset, and an observer gets concerned that they’re witnessing an actual mad person talking openly to Shiva the Destroyer. I always see the headset, so I never truly get confused.

However, this morning a woman was doing it in the elevator, and her hair was covering the headset. I honestly checked my observation of this woman against my own schema of reality. I asked myself, “Is she really on the phone? What evidence do I have that she is? I could be witnessing something special here.” Part of me wanted her to be mad. It would have made a better story.

Apparently, she and her friend were talking - on the phone - about text messaging. Think about that. Take two moments. There’s a meta level there, a feedback loop that if left unchecked could lead to…

Imagine a future in which we can transmit thought directly to our friends through a device implanted in our wrists. Imagine that we still have phones and computers and internets and everything else. Now imagine two people standing next to each other, conversing with their mouths (talking) about their simulaneous thought conversation about a phone conversation they had in which they discussed a text message from a third party that recounted an IM conversation that person had with a friend while they were both on the phone with each other. I wonder if this kind of scenario would lead to a communication black hole, where the density of meta is so high it doesn’t allow any thoughts to escape.

Anyway, this is the last thing she said to her friend, obviously about plan minutes, as I left the elevator.

You like me unlimited; I like you only five dollars worth.