A warning about this post. It’s not funny or meant to be, and it’s pretty specific to the U.S. However the issues behind the specifics are being discussed in other parts of the world.
I’ve been rolling Rights (with a capital R because it’s big and important) around in my head the last couple of days because of Gizmodo’s RIAA Boycott. I got interested in fair use, copyright law, and the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) when I bought my iPod video last year and tried to put my purchased DVDs on it. I wondered why iTunes comes with a “Import CD” button but not a “Import DVD” button. That’s when I discovered that unlike CDs, DVDs come encrypted. In order to download the electronic file stored on the DVD, a person must remove the encryption. (I’m sorry if this elementary to you. I’m taking you through my process to show you how I got interested in this subject.) Then I found out that if iTunes were to include an “Import DVD” button, they would be breaking the law because according to the DMCA, it is illegal for Apple to sell or provide software that makes it possible to remove encryption. Further, it is illegal for me to remove encryption using software legally available outside of the U.S.
Then I remembered hearing somewhere that it was considered legal, back in the days of vinyl and cassette tapes, to copy an album or CD for your own personal use onto a cassette tape. It was illegal to sell the cassette, but it was legal to make the cassette to use on your Walkman. This, under copyright law, was called fair use. Fair use protects certain instances in which people that do not have permission to copy copyrighted material. As in the example with the cassette tape and CD, it protects, among other things, educators who wish to excerpt material for their students, critics who wish to review a book, movie, piece of music, or game, and anyone who wishes to parody a copyrighted work.
Hopefully, you see where I’m going. It is illegal to remove encryption from a DVD, but it is legal to make a copy of copyrighted material for your own personal use. So, I’m fucked with my DVD-to-iPod situation, if I wish to not break the law…but fair use says that I wouldn’t be breaking the law. To me, this is a conflict between my consumer rights and greedy movie studios, companies who wish to re-sell the same material to me in a different format.
So, I’m asking you to write your congressperson to support any legislation that will allow me to watch my legally purchased movies on my iPod on a long flight to Sundance. I should also ask you to write your congressperson to support my right to marry Jerry, but, you know…one step at a time. Today: watching O Brother, Where Art Thou on a 2 1/2″ screen; tomorrow: my right to inherit Jerry’s Social Security should he fall down a mountain in Sundance.
Oh. And sorry for the lack of funny.
Junior | 01-Mar-07 at 8:48 pm | Permalink
I totally feel you on this one. I too don’t want to break the law, but I would like to watch movies where I want to. According to the DMCA, I can’t rip a DVD to my laptop so I can watch it on the go, but I can bring the DVDs along with me to watch them on the go. Why can’t I just rip and carry less? The good news is I have already sent my views to good old Joe Lieberman, but who knows what he will do. He is crazy.
MagnusFromBerlin | 02-Mar-07 at 5:37 am | Permalink
This is not US specific. We do have those same draconian laws… EU wide. For awhile it was even illegal to talk about bypassing copy protections…
alex | 02-Mar-07 at 7:01 am | Permalink
Weird. I’m starting to read more and more about people wanting to take fair use back. Hopefully we’ll start seeing more legislation that will force the hands of the RIAA and MPAA. Is it a myth that Germany, at one time, had laws forbidding to talk about the Holocaust?
MagnusFromBerlin | 02-Mar-07 at 8:26 am | Permalink
Not to my knowledge, but you could get easily banned for such things, that is for sure… “The Producers” for example was banned in german for 30 years (it’s not anymore). The display of nazi insignia also is a banning reason, but they found ways around that, otherwise we could have never seen “Raiders of the Lost Ark” for example… on the other hand the Star Trek episode “Patterns of Force” (thats the one with the nazis) was delayed for a 30 years …
But the main difference of course is that the ownership of Nazi paraphernalia itself isn’t liable to prosecution (not even Mein Kampf) only the selling, while the holding of a DVD backup is… which puts it in the same legal realm as child pornography…
Junior | 05-Mar-07 at 12:51 am | Permalink
http://www.tuxick.net/pics/piracy2.jpg
alex | 05-Mar-07 at 1:58 pm | Permalink
Thanks Junior. Very cool indeed.
Junior | 05-Mar-07 at 4:23 pm | Permalink
I try.